Tag Archives | consumer protection

Give Subway an Inch and They Get a Mile

Consumers in the US and Australia have sued Subway for cheating them out of 1 inch from their foot long subs. I know what you think – you hate these suits and the lawyers who bring them. It’s one damn inch and these people should get a real job.  I know you think this, because I’ve seen your complaints on Facebook and the web. And, you are just wrong. If we had more people willing to pick fights with companies cheating their customers, we would have a better, more competitive marketplace.

Subway may be cheating its customers. There are now dozens of claims and pictures of subs shorter than promised.  Some franchise owners have admitted that Subway is directing them to cut back on the amounts of ingredients. For God’s sake, someone from Subway Australia simply admitted that “12 Inch Footlongs” isn’t a promise, just a marketing gimmick.   Maybe shorting you an inch isn’t a big deal, but what if they do it everywhere, with every sandwich? It may be cheating you out of $.40-$.60 per sandwich. But, that means tens of millions of dollars profit to Subway. So, what is a small con to each customer is a massive con across the whole customer base.   

Look, a popular way to cheat consumers is to nickel and dime them knowing that the amounts are too small for most people to fight about. But, those nickel and dimes add up to a hefty profit. It may mean the difference between bonuses and enormous bonuses for company brass. It may mean a competitive advantage that helps bigger companies squash little companies. If you are one of those little companies getting squashed by a bigger company, then this is absolutely your fight. 

The only way for consumers to fight back against the nickel and dime con is to sue the cheaters. Then what happens is big business organizations (the Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable and their ilk) launch a coordinated media attack, blaming the character and motives of people that sued. The lawyers are greedy and scheming; the plaintiffs are lazy, corrupt and haven’t got anything better to do. At that moment, you have a real choice. Either you can support the big business schtick that ducks accountability and demonizes fighters. Or, you can understand that, though certainly not perfect, these suits keep big business more honest than they may be without them. And, then bring a ruler to the sandwich shop.

Comments { 3 }

Amazing Government Websites With Startling, Fascinating and Odd Info – Pt 2

The federal government collects information about business and products so that everyone can see the impact of business and products on people. We thought we’d fill you in.

Here, in Part 2, is our second favorite government database.

Name:  Recalls and product safety news

URL:  http://www.cpsc.gov/businfo/reg1.html.

What it collects: Recalled products.

“Noble” reason we love it:  Because it is publicly available warnings on the care that should be taken with products. And, that life is precious.

Real reason we love it: Seemingly commonsense, foreseeable dangers in certain products that get recalled because of the obvious.

 For instance:

Comments { 0 }

Amazing Government Websites With Startling, Fascinating and Odd Info – Pt 1

The federal government collects information about business and products so that everyone can see the impact of business and products on people. We thought we’d fill you in. Here, in Part 1, is our favorite government database by far.

Name:  The NATIONAL ELECTRONIC INJURY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM

URL:  https://www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/NEISSQuery/Home.aspx

What it Collects:  Emergency room reports of people and their injuries from consumer products.

“Noble” reason we love it:  Because it is publicly available warnings on the care that should be taken with products. And, that life is precious.

Real reason we love it:  Narrative descriptions of non-fatal, non-child foibles; living slapstick.

For instance:  We searched 40 year old people who ingested things during 2010 to see what our contemporaries are doing with their time. Here is what we got back (click below for larger view):

 

 

 

Comments { 0 }

Hidden Laws, Confusing Regulations

This is a continuing series called Apple Pie Economics about the deliberate forces and unhappy accidents that are getting in the way of us living up to our entrepreneurial potential. Right now, we’re talking about the problems. Later, we’ll talk about solutions.  Earlier posts from this series can be found here.

Hidden Laws and Regulations. There are many hidden regulations, too complex to understand or too illogical to find – except by mistake, great expense or prosecution. These hidden laws and opaque regulations burden, stymie and sometimes crush entrepreneurs.

Laura. Recently, I wrote about the experiences of Laura, a successful entrepreneur, who shuttered her company to get health insurance from an employer. The lack of health insurance was not the only systemic feature that exhausted her patience for being the boss: the second thing that did her in was the confusion and inaccessibility of legal obligations for her business.

Laura had a hard time identifying the laws she needed to follow. When she looked for a lawyer, the fees she was quoted were so high, that she didn’t believe she could afford to hire a corporate lawyer. She told me that she often felt a nagging sense of doom because of what she didn’t know.  Eventually, an advisor made a mistake that cost Laura many months and many dollars to sort out and she decided she was done.  The unknowable risks associated with staying in business just became too high to bear. Anecdotally, I hear about this problem more than you may suspect. A new client with a seriously thriving business just told me that because of the remoteness of legal rights and remedies, she had her trade secrets ripped off and had to settle a breach of contract suit with a client who reneged.

Impenetrable rules. The law hides in crevices; the information entrepreneurs need about compliance is either locked away in a stilted 10-volume treatise or in a lawyer’s head for $500 per hour. Have you ever tried to figure out how to manufacture a kid’s crib? What about how to write a warranty for a table saw? Or, just get a plain old business license to operate an office in Chicago – with a fire alarm? The regulations for the kid’s crib will be governed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission with regulations that require legal, business, importation and engineering knowledge to understand the delicate mixture of materials, testing, certifications and shipping necessary to make it and sell it in the U.S. The table saw could be a lightly regulated commercial product, unless you intend to sell it in hardware stores – in that case, you have to follow federal warranty law under Magnuson-Moss and the FTC; worse, your ability to limit certain damages will depend on state law. And, state products liability law will probably obligate you to include warnings against using a thumb against the blade while it is moving. There will also probably be industry regulations and standard weight and measure guidelines. As for the city business license, there are several types of licenses you may need; which ones could vary depending on which bureaucrat you are talking to at the moment. One thing is certain (though unclear): you need a separate license for your fire alarm.

None of this information is available all in one place. In fact, there isn’t even a recognized way to organize the information even if it is assembled. That is actually why I wrote Birth to Buyout: to create a way of organizing the information and to compile – if nothing else – (1) the questions that need to be asked by a business and (2) a head start to get the answers.

Regulation Needed. I believe to my core in smart, fair regulation.  Businesses unregulated by an impartial observer would be like football played without rules, sidelines and refs – a chaotic death match. You may hate the regulation that keeps you from exagerrating about your products, but it also keeps your competitor from lying about them.  The rules that limit your ability to dump waste into the river also allow you and your kids to dive off the side of a boat. Mandatory meat packing inspections that make food more expensive also make it safe to eat steak. We know what industrial America looks like without regulation: brown, thick air hovering over burning rivers.

Clarity is Critical. But, there is a real problem with the regulations we have. Even the smart, fair regulations make little sense. Trouble sleeping? Go here and read the rules that tell you what you have to say to the world when you go public and how you have to say it.

If you don’t want a nap right now, here is a tiny sample from these rules:

I had this fantastic mentor named David Guin who taught me securities law (and just about everything else I know). David told me the only reason lawyers get paid so much is because we’re the only ones who will sit in a chair, wade through this molasses and interpret it for people. But, that means that your ability to grasp and follow these rules depends on your ability to afford a lawyer who will do the slog.

The opacity of laws and regulations poses a serious challenge to the emerging or struggling businessperson. The impentrability of the obligations suffocates commercial expression; worse, they stack the deck in favor of the companies that can afford lawyers. The laws and regs need to be rewritten, colorized, organized and/or visualized. I’ll offer some suggestions and some areas where that is happening in a few weeks. (The suspense is killing me.)


Comments { 1 }

How To Sell Groupon Coupons Without Losing Lawsuits

Did you know that some of the companies that have done these Groupon sales have gotten sued? The problem is the expiration date. For instance, I bought $200 worth of personal training sessions for $80 – 2 years ago, so my coupon has expired. Technically, I could sue, but I would be too embarassed to admit that I never called to make the appointment. Others, however, are not. To avoid those customers, read below.

Judie Rinearson, one of my old law partners at Bryan Cave, has written this business law article about how you and your company could make a Groupon-like promotion and comply with the law, all at the same time. It’s a terrific article and good legal advice. And so…

Avoiding Legal Traps When Offering “Groupon” or “Living Social”-like Discounted Certificates | BankBryanCave.

We have heard from many retailers and service providers who are interested in building up new business by offering a deeply-discounted “Groupon” or “Living Social”-like” promotional certificate program.  This is how these work: emails go out to local residents letting them know, for example, that for $30 they can get a certificate worth $60 towards food at the French Bistro, a local restaurant.  However, the discounted certificate almost always has a short expiration date:  like a manufacturer’s coupon, the consumer must take advantage of the offer within a few weeks or months.

And that’s the problem.  Of course, a short expiration date makes perfect sense from a marketing perspective.  But these are different from the manufacturer’s coupons you get in your Sunday paper, because the consumer has had to pay for them. Even though the consumer pays less than full value, they are still paying.  That is why, although these programs are highly popular, there has also been a spate of class action lawsuits because certain expiration dates may violate certain federal or state laws.

The good news is that there is a way to offer a discounted Groupon-like promotional certificate program, without getting on the wrong side of the law. Here’s how.

I.  The Issues Under Federal Law.

In 2009, Congress passed the CARD Act, which among other things, regulates gift cards and gift certificates.  Under the CARD Act, both open and closed loop gift certificates and gift cards are prohibited from expiring prior to five years from date of issuance.

However, there is an important exclusion for loyalty, award and promotional cards (referred to collectively as “promotional cards”).  Expiration dates are permitted on promotional cards provided that the fact that it is a “promotional card” and the expiration date are both clearly disclosed on the front of the card or certificate.

The tricky part is making sure that your discounted gift certificate program falls within the definition of “promotional programs”.  To meet the definition, the card must be issued to a  consumer “in connection with a loyalty, award, or promotional program.”  To make sure you can demonstrate that you have issued your discounted certificate in connection with an award, loyalty or promotional program, make sure you put appropriate language in your contract with your discounted coupon provider stating that the discounted certificates are issued “in connection” with a promotional program. Also, make sure you include on your website, advertising and other marketing materials language that confirms that the discounted certificate is offered in connection with a promotional, loyalty or award program.

So, when it comes to federal law, you can still have an expiration date on your discounted certificate as long as you clearly and conspicuously indicate on the front of your discounted certificate that it is a “promotional” or “award” or “loyalty” certificate, and the expiration date.  In addition, since these discounted certificate programs are offered and purchased online, the “promotional” nature of the certificate and its expiration date must be clearly and conspicuously indicated in the actual offer (i.e., on the website page that displays the offer for purchase or in the email that advertises the offer).  If you do all of this, and are as clear and transparent as possible (no hidden expiration dates; no mouse type disclosures), you should be reasonably compliant with federal law.

II.  The Issues Under State Laws.

Just because you are compliant with federal law, don’t think you are off the hook.  Unfortunately, a lot of state laws also restrict or even prohibit expiration dates altogether.  Moreover, most of the state laws do not simply exclude loyalty, award and promotional cards in the same manner that the federal laws do.  Instead, many state laws add an additional requirement;  in order to be eligible for the promotional or reward card exemption, the consumer must not have paid value or “consideration” for the certificate.  For example, although the laws from the state of Ohio do not permit an expiration until two years after issuance, there is an exception for promotional cards, but only if the card is “distributed by the issuer to a consumer pursuant to an awards, loyalty, or promotional program without any money or anything of value being given in exchange for the gift card by the consumer.”  (Ohio Consumer Protection law – ORC §1349.61(C)(1) (emphasis added)).

The problem is this:  While a promotional program is exempt under federal law, it may not be exempt under state law, because generally, in the Groupon-like discounted certificate program, the consumer has to pay a fee for the discounted certificate.  There are a lot of states that have this kind of law on the books; you’ll need to check the local laws applicable in your state to know for sure.

So, how do you offer a Groupon-like discounted certificate without running afoul of your local state laws?  The answer is simple, but it must be done right.  You need to separate the paid gift card or gift certificate from the free, limited time, promotional offer.  It works like this:

  • In our example, when the consumer pays $30 for the discounted certificate to the French Bistro, the consumer receives a $30 gift card or gift certificate that does not expire.
  • Together with the gift certificate, the consumer also receives a limited time promotional offer:  for three months that $30 gift card is worth $60.  However at the end of three months, the promotional offer (i.e, the doubling of the value of the gift certificate) expires.  There is no reason why the promotional offer cannot expire.
  • However, even after three months, the consumer still has a $30 gift certificate that continues to be valid until it is used.  The consumer never loses the value of the $30 that has been paid.

To make this work and to be effective against regulatory or class action claims, your online offer must disclose very clearly and carefully all of the terms and conditions, the expiration date that applies to the promotional offer, and, of course, the fact that the paid gift certificate or gift card does not expire, even if the promotional offer does.

With care in structuring the programs, and with good clear disclosures in all offers and marketing materials, these Groupons or Living Social-like promotional certificate programs can be a true win-win for both consumers and retailers.

If you have any questions on discounted promotional certificate programs, please fee free to contact us.

Judith Rinearson
Judith.Rinearson@bryancave.com
(212) 541-1135

Jennifer Crowder
Jennifer.Crowder@bryancave.com
(816) 374-3365

Comments { 1 }

THE 7 TYPES OF REGULATIONS

Nearly every service, product and material has laws or rules about it that you should (and often have to) follow. Governments regulate products and services that have the capacity to injure: restaurant refrigerators, mutual fund ads and lawyers all follow rules to keep people physically and financially safe.  But what do these regulations make you do? Here are the seven main types of regulations (PS in the trade, these are called “compliance.”).

Comments { 0 }

The Soda that Started Consumer Protection

Law usually emerges out of a simple, painful, human story – that is what makes law so compelling. Take the birth of consumer protections.

It all started in 1928, when a woman named May Donoghue and a friend sat down at the Wellmeadow Café in Paisely, Scotland.  Even though the Industrial Revolution had been surging for nearly 200 years, there were almost no rules about safety or cleanliness.  Back then, only people who had a contract with a manufacturer to make a product could sue for a defect in it, which excluded just about everyone.

It was in that environment that May Donoghue ordered a pear and ice cream soda. To go with Mrs. Donoghue’s ice cream soda, the café’s owner delivered a brown glass bottle of ginger beer he had bought from a sodamaker named David Stevenson. After Mrs Donoghue finished half of the drink, her friend emptied the last of the ginger beer into the tumbler of ice cream – along with the dead snail decomposing in the ginger beer now sloshing around in Mrs. Donoghue’s stomach. Mrs. Donoghue got really sick.

Mrs. Donoghue sued Stevenson, the guy who made the soda.  Stevenson won — Mrs. Donoghue hadn’t bought the beer from him. But, Mrs. Donoghue’s lawyer refused to give up. Fresh from losing a different lawsuit involving a dead mouse and a bottle of ginger beer (I have never been able to drink ginger beer because of this), the lawyer sued again. And this time he won, setting the table for all products regulation.

A manufacturer of products … with knowledge that the absence of reasonable care in the preparation or putting up of products will result in an injury to the consumer’s life or property, owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. Donoghue (or McAlister) v Stevenson, [1932] All ER Rep 1; [1932] AC 562; House of Lords

This is just one of the fascinating stories that gave rise to laws that guide and protect us.  The parents of most laws are tragedy and lobbying (but that’s another story). The next time you’re at a Scottish café about to dig into an ice cream soda, give a little toast to May Donoghue, her upset stomach and that poor, dead snail.

(P.S. if anyone wants to argue that products reg started with a defective Buick, I invite you to comment.)

Comments { 1 }